Falcon 9 vs. Starship: Size, Engines, Thrust and Reuse Compared Using SpaceX's Official Figures

Checked 2026-10-22 / about 7 min read

Contents
  1. The conclusion: every figure is very different
  2. What the numbers show (our calculation)
  3. How reuse differs
  4. FAQ
  5. Summary
  6. Sources (checked 2026-10-16)

On SpaceX's official pages, Falcon 9 is 70 m tall and 3.7 m in diameter; the whole Starship system is 124 m tall and 9 m in diameter. Falcon 9 lists 22,800 kg to low Earth orbit, while Starship is designed to carry 100+ tonnes in a fully reusable configuration. The reuse approach also differs: Starship is designed to return to the launch site and be caught by the tower. But Starship's figures are design figures, not results.

Size comparison of Falcon 9 and Starship: 70 m and 124 m (AI-generated concept diagram based on the official figures; proportions are approximate)
Fig. 1: Size comparison (AI-generated; a concept diagram).

We put the figures from the Falcon 9 and Starship articles side by side (SpaceX official pages, checked 2026-10-16).

The conclusion: every figure is very different

ItemFalcon 9Starship (whole system)
Stages22 (Super Heavy + Starship)
Height70 m124 m
Diameter3.7 m9 m
First-stage engines9 Merlin33 Raptor (Super Heavy)
Second-stage engines1 Merlin Vacuum6 (3 Raptor, 3 Raptor Vacuum)
Propellantskerosene (RP-1) + liquid oxygenmethane + liquid oxygen
First-stage thrustover 1.7 million lbf at sea level8,240 tf (18.1 Mlbf)
Payload to low Earth orbit22,800 kg100+ t (fully reusable configuration, design)
Reusedescribed as reusable (fairing also recovered)both stages designed to return and be caught by the tower

[A note for beginners]

tf (tonne-force) and lbf (pound-force) are units of force. 1 tf ≈ 9.8 kN and 1 lbf ≈ 4.45 N (general conversions).

What the numbers show (our calculation)

  • Height: 124 ÷ 70 ≈ 1.8 times. Diameter: 9 ÷ 3.7 ≈ 2.4 times.
  • First-stage thrust: Falcon 9 over 1.7 million lbf (about 7.6 MN); Super Heavy 18.1 million lbf (about 80 MN). The ratio is about 10 times.
  • Payload: 100+ t ÷ 22.8 t ≈ 4.4 times or more.
Thrust comparison: Falcon 9 first stage and Super Heavy (AI-generated concept diagram based on the official figures)
Fig. 2: First-stage thrust comparison (AI-generated; a concept diagram).

How reuse differs

  • Falcon 9: SpaceX describes it as the world's first reusable orbital-class rocket. The idea is that flying the most expensive part again lowers cost. SpaceX also aims to recover and reuse the fairing.
  • Starship: Starship and Super Heavy are designed to return to the launch site, be caught, and launch again without refurbishment. On-orbit refilling is also planned.
How reuse differs: Falcon 9 lands; Starship is caught by the tower (AI-generated concept diagram based on the official descriptions)
Fig. 3: How reuse differs (AI-generated; a concept diagram).

FAQ

Which is bigger, Falcon 9 or Starship?

Starship: 124 m tall and 9 m in diameter as a whole system (design). Falcon 9 is 70 m tall and 3.7 m in diameter.

How does reuse differ?

Falcon 9 is described as reusable. Starship is designed so both stages return to the launch site and are caught by the tower.

Has Starship already flown?

The official page text is a design description. This article did not check actual flight results.

Summary

  • Falcon 9: 70 m tall, 3.7 m diameter; Starship (whole): 124 m, 9 m (design).
  • First-stage engines: 9 vs. 33. Propellants: kerosene vs. methane.
  • Payload: 22,800 kg vs. 100+ t (design).

Sources (checked 2026-10-16)

This article is for learning about science and technology and is not investment advice. Facts and the author's reading are kept separate. The figures are AI-generated illustrations.

Thank you for reading. Was this article useful to you?