Merlin vs. Raptor: Comparing SpaceX's Rocket Engines by Fuel, Cycle and Thrust (Checked on Official Pages)

Checked 2026-10-22 / about 6 min read

Contents
  1. The conclusion: different fuel, different cycle
  2. How many times Merlin is Raptor?
  3. Counting engines
  4. FAQ
  5. Summary
  6. Sources (checked 2026-10-16)

According to SpaceX's official pages, Merlin burns rocket-grade kerosene (RP-1) and liquid oxygen in a gas-generator cycle; Raptor is a reusable methane-oxygen staged-combustion engine. The pages list Merlin thrust as 845 kN (190,000 lbf) and Raptor thrust as 250 tf (551 klbf). The Starship page says Raptor has twice the thrust of Merlin, but calculating from the two figures gives about 2.9 times. The pages do not explain the difference.

A comparison of Merlin and Raptor: fuel, cycle and thrust (AI-generated concept diagram, different from the real engine shape)
Fig. 1: Merlin and Raptor compared (AI-generated; a concept diagram).

We looked at Falcon 9 and Starship. Here we compare their engines, Merlin and Raptor, using the figures on SpaceX's official Falcon 9 and Starship pages (checked 2026-10-16).

The conclusion: different fuel, different cycle

ItemMerlin (Falcon 9 page)Raptor (Starship page)
Used onFalcon 1, Falcon 9, Falcon HeavyStarship (upper stage and Super Heavy)
Propellantsrocket-grade kerosene (RP-1) and liquid oxygenmethane and oxygen (Super Heavy: sub-cooled liquid methane and LOX)
Cyclegas-generatorstaged-combustion
Thrust845 kN (190,000 lbf)250 tf (551 klbf)
Size(not on the page)1.3 m diameter, 2.9 m height
Reuse"originally designed for recovery and reuse"a "reusable" engine
Vacuum versionMerlin Vacuum (second stage, 981 kN)Raptor Vacuum (RVac)

[A note for beginners]

Gas-generator and staged-combustion cycles differ in how the pumps that feed fuel are driven inside the engine. (General explanation; the pages do not explain the difference.) kN and tf are both units of force: 1 tf ≈ 9.8 kN (a general conversion).

Fuel difference: kerosene (RP-1) versus methane (AI-generated concept diagram based on the official pages)
Fig. 2: Fuel difference (AI-generated; a concept diagram).

How many times Merlin is Raptor?

The Starship page says Raptor has "twice the thrust of the Falcon 9 Merlin engine". But calculating from the pages' figures:

  • Merlin: 845 kN
  • Raptor: 250 tf ≈ 2,452 kN (250 × 9.8066, our calculation)
  • Ratio: 2,452 ÷ 845 ≈ 2.9

The pages do not explain the gap between "twice" and about 2.9.

[The author's reading, not a confirmed fact]

Thrust differs between sea level and vacuum, and it is unclear from the pages which condition each figure and the "twice" comparison refer to. (The Falcon 9 page's "over 1.7 million lbf at sea level" matches nine Merlins, so 845 kN is probably the sea-level value.) So we just record the gap.

Thrust comparison: the official
Fig. 3: Thrust comparison (AI-generated; a concept diagram).

Counting engines

  • Falcon 9's first stage: nine Merlins (over 1.7 million lbf at sea level).
  • Starship's upper stage: six (three Raptor, three Raptor Vacuum); Super Heavy: 33 Raptors (13 maneuverable in the center, 20 on the perimeter).

FAQ

What is the main difference between Merlin and Raptor?

The fuel: Merlin uses kerosene (RP-1) and liquid oxygen; Raptor uses methane and oxygen. The cycles also differ (gas-generator vs. staged-combustion).

Which is stronger?

By the pages' figures, Raptor. The page says twice; a calculation gives about 2.9 times.

Are both reusable?

SpaceX says Merlin was originally designed for recovery and reuse, and calls Raptor a reusable engine.

Summary

  • Merlin: kerosene (RP-1) + liquid oxygen, gas-generator cycle, 845 kN.
  • Raptor: methane + oxygen, staged-combustion cycle, 250 tf (about 2,452 kN).

Sources (checked 2026-10-16)

This article is for learning about science and technology and is not investment advice. Facts and the author's reading are kept separate. The figures are AI-generated illustrations.

Thank you for reading. Was this article useful to you?